![]() ![]() As I have said many times, the more ridiculous a belief is, the more tenaciously it tends to be held. I hope this puts and end the third baseman myth, but I doubt it. So the house edge of the basic strategy playing first player was almost the same, regardless of whether the second player played correctly or wildly incorrectly. In a simulation of 1.05 billion hands the loss of the first player was 0.282%, and the second player was 11.260%. Second, I had the first player follow the same correct strategy, and the second player follow the same correct strategy except: A pair of 5’s doubles against dealer 2 through 9, otherwise hit. A pair of 6’s splits against dealer 2 through 6, otherwise hit. A pair of 7’s splits against dealer 2 through 7, otherwise hit. You will have to put in the hours played yourself. If you feel any of these are inaccurate, change them as you wish. ![]() That choice will propagate the hands per hour, house edge, and standard deviation fields. Over almost 1.6 billion rounds, the loss of the first player to act was 0.289%, and the second player to act of 0.288%. A pair of 9’s splits against dealer 2 through 9, except for 7, otherwise stand. To use the calculator, select a game from the pulldown menu. Player may re-split to four hands, including acesįirst, I had both players follow correct total-dependent basic strategy. The rules I put in are the standard liberal Vegas Strip rules as follows. However, you are the lucky 1000th person to ask, so I took the trouble to prove it by random simulation. In ten years of running this site I steadfastly denied the myth that bad players cause other players to lose in blackjack. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |